Archive for McKinleyville

Have a Heart Rally for Homecare Workers: Tuesday 12:30 Courthouse – WEAR RED

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 3, 2013 by highboldtage

the following came via Redwood Progressive [ rs@richardsalzman.com ] email letter :

The California United Homecare Workers (CUHW) union will be holding a rally on Tuesday and we need your help to make it a success. Please join us as we continue our fight to improve the lives of those who keep our seniors and people with disabilities healthy at home. Here are the details:

What: Rally for Homecare Justice – Wear red to show that you “have a heart” for homecare.

weheartthomecare

[edit the graphic is mine, not part of original ]

Where: Humboldt County Courthouse, 825 Fifth Street, Eureka

When: Tuesday, February 5 at 12:30 pm

Why: Negotiations with the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors, acting as the Humboldt County In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority, have dragged on for over a year as the Supervisors have refused to offer a single penny to the lowest paid caregivers in California. After the workers put forward a Settlement Proposal last December, the Board of Supervisors unilaterally ended negotiations and refused to consider the proposal.

We will be joined at the rally by allies from local non-profits, other unions, the disability rights community, and senior advocates, among others. We hope you will be able to join us too. Following the rally, community supporters are invited to attend a reception at the union’s office, located at 314 L Street, Eureka.

For more information:  shaneb@cuhw.org or  (707) 382-7270.

http://www.cuhw.org/

– To contact the Supervisors:

Rex Bohn   <rbohn@co.humboldt.ca.us> 476-2391

Estelle Fennell  <efennell@co.humboldt.ca.us> 476-2392

Mark Lovelace <mlovelace@co.humboldt.ca.us> 476-2393

Virginia Bass <vbass@co.humboldt.ca.us> 476-2394

Ryan Sundberg <rsundberg@co.humboldt.ca.us> 476-2395

Poll:  Do Humboldt County’s IHSS Workers Deserve A Raise?

or take it at polldaddy:

http://poll.fm/3wz0i

Refinancin​g Student Loan Debt: A Modest Proposal

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on December 29, 2012 by highboldtage

link here http://urlet.com/renowned.watching
The recent McKinleyville bond scam (the issuance of 40 year zero coupon bonds that will cost over $50 million to repay) brought to me an idea of how to refinance the crushing debt burden faced by our young people who actually believed the hype about the value of an education.  The McKinleyville School board calls these zero coupon bonds just a “tool” in the “financial toolkit” and I see what they mean now.
For instance, if we take $10,000 face value of student debt and swap it out with zero coupon debt maturing at 50 years at 1% interest (let’s give them a break on the interest, what the hey, they are our kids and right now the banksters are getting an interest free float from the feds of $80 billion  a month)  and you get a zero coupon debt paying back $16,446.31 in the year 2062.   Why 50 years?  Well they way they talk about pushing back the retirement age our 20 somethings are looking at 50 years of work.  Right?
So using the tool of zero coupon debt our young indebted people can re-fi their student loans, each $10,000 increment paid back with $16,446.31 in the year 2062.
If the tool fits, use it.
http://www.miniwebtool.com/zero-coupon-bond-calculator/?f=16446.31&r=1&t=50
have a peaceful day,
Bill
link here http://urlet.com/renowned.watching

Southern Oregon Climate Change Sanctuary for Ancient Redwood Clones

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on December 3, 2012 by highboldtage

via SacBee:

A Michigan nurseryman and his team of tree climbers and horticulturists have cloned the world’s biggest redwoods and giant sequoias, bringing some of them back from stumps cut more than 100 years ago.

David Milarch, co-founder of the Archangel Ancient Tree Archive and the Champion Tree Project, hopes the small plantation south of Port Orford, Ore., will give the ancient giants a leg up on moving north to cooler climes as the climate changes and be the start of a campaign to plant some of the world’s fastest-growing trees all around the globe.

“I think we are entering into a time where the largest, oldest living beings on this earth need our help,” said Milarch, 63, of Copemish, Mich.

Only about 5 percent of the ancient redwoods are left standing, and among the sources of the clones is one that fell some 120 years ago- the Fieldbrook Stump near McKinleyville, Calif. Sprouts still come out of the stump, which is 33  1/2 feet in diameter without the bark. One of those sprouts provided cuttings for the project.

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/12/03/5028196/mich-man-planting-clones-of-long.html

Support the Humboldt County IHSS Workers Struggle for Fair Pay!

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on October 31, 2012 by highboldtage

forwarded from Shane Brinton <shaneb@cuhw.org>

Dear Friends and Neighbors,

If you know anyone who is an In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) worker or a recipient who benefits from these vital services, you have probably heard about the struggle to win better wages and benefits for homecare workers.  You are invited to learn more about this ongoing struggle – and how you can get involved – at one of the following community coffee meetings later this week:

–Thursday, November 1  9:00 am to 10:30 am  Golden Harvest Cafe  1062 G Street  Arcata

– Thursday, November 1  4:00 pm to 5:30 pm  Starbucks  1924 Central Avenue  McKinleyville

— Friday, November 2  4:00 pm to 5:30 pm  Calico’s Cafe  808 Redwood Drive  Garberville

– These meetings are being hosted by the California United Homecare Workers (CUHW), the union that represents IHSS providers in Humboldt County. Our statewide President Gail Ennis will be available to answer questions, as will local members and organizers.  This is an open invitation to all homecare workers, IHSS recipients, and anyone else who is interested in learning more. We’ll treat you to a cup of coffee or tea and chat about this important struggle.

RSVP appreciated, but not required. Please respond to shaneb@cuhw.org.   In Solidarity,  Shane Brinton  Humboldt Community Outreach Liaison  California United Homecare Workers  AFSCME / SEIU Local 4034  Cell:             (707) 382-7270       http://www.cuhw.org

Temperatures Hit Record Low Maximums in Arcata, McKinleyville and Crescent City

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on February 24, 2011 by highboldtage

… Record low maximum temperature set at Crescent City CA Airport…

A record low maximum temperature of 44 degrees was set at Crescent City
CA Airport (kcec) today. This breaks the old record of 49 degrees set in 1951.

… Record low maximum temperature set at Arcata/McKinleyville CA Airport…

A record low maximum temperature of 44 degrees was set at Arcata/McKinleyville
Airport (kacv) today. This breaks the old record of 48 degrees set in both 1993
and 1996.

http://www.wunderground.com/US/CA/001.html#SPE

Consolidation of Humboldt Cities?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on August 19, 2010 by highboldtage

What would happen if Arcata, Eureka, Fortuna, Cutten, Myrtletown, Bayside, McKinleyville, and Samoa were all consolidated into one city, with contiguous boundaries?

This would create a metropolitan (well maybe at least politan ) area that would offer benefits of scale in costs of government.  These largely urban and suburban areas once consolidated will need only one city council, one city manager, one police chief and one fire chief.  We would not need the HBMWD or the Port Authority.  The costs of city infrastructure could be rationalized in a larger and better planned environment.  One city planning department, one public works department, one city engineers department, one redevelopment department.

I am not necessarily promoting this idea, as even I can see some drawbacks but it is worth thinking about.

It is unclear to me where a proposal like this fits into the big government/small government debate.  In one sense, a lot of small governments will be elimated to create one bigger one.  On the other hand, given the savings of scale and efficiency that consodation might bring, the total cost of government should be lower.

Who would be in favor of this?  Well people who favor government that costs less for one group.  People who favor govermental efficiency for another.

Who would be opposed?  Perhaps property owners in the currently unincorporated areas might fear rising taxes.  County officials who see diminishing empire.  Certain city employees and local politicians who will be downsized after the changeover.  Certain real estate interests who are just fine with the status quo.

Comments?

Tree Killing Disease Spreads from McKinleyville Nursery

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on July 26, 2009 by highboldtage

Tree Killing Disease Spreads from McKinleyville Nursery

Scientists were baffled in February when ramorum spores were discovered in Mill Creek in McKinleyville, 13 miles north of Eureka and 45 miles north of the nearest infested forest. Mill Creek is 2 miles south of Widow White Creek, where inoculum from the pathogen was detected in 2006 and 2007. Neither stream has any vegetation around it that is known to carry the pathogen.

Transfer a mystery

Infected plants were found in a nursery between the two creeks in 2004, 2006 and 2007, but scientists cannot figure out how the spores got into the streams. Mill Creek is on a coastal bluff north of the Humboldt Bay watershed at least a mile away from the nursery.

http://urlet.com/advocate.field

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/23/MNRG18IC3Q.DTL

Chase leaves one dead, another injured

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on May 12, 2009 by highboldtage

Chase leaves one dead, another injured

A high speed chase on State Route 299 left one suspect dead and another in the hospital Monday night, after the suspects fired shots at law enforcement during a 30-mile pursuit that ended just east of Willow Creek, according to the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office.

Carsharing

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 27, 2008 by highboldtage

Carsharing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article deals with the use of shared cars for public transport purposes. For the activity of private sharing arrangements between car owners, see Carpool
Carsharing vehicles in their reserved spots

Carsharing vehicles in their reserved spots

Carsharing is a model of car rental where people rent cars for short periods of time, often by the hour. The organization renting the cars may be a commercial business or the users may be organized as a democratically-controlled company, public agency, cooperative, ad hoc grouping. Today there are more than six hundred cities in the world where people can carshare.[1]

The term carsharing is also used for carpooling or ride sharing some places.

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Description

Despite its evident English language origins, the term carsharing (earlier often written as two separate words, and still today occasionally hyphenated) is now the widely accepted international term. Synonyms include autodelen in Dutch, autopartage in French, bildeling in Danish, and bilpool in Swedish. In the United Kingdom the term “car clubs” is used, while “car sharing” is also used to refer to ride sharing. Brand names in use include: Andelsbilklub, AutoDelen, Autotaxis, Autoteilen, Auto zum Teilen, Autoparate, Avancar, Bilpool, Block Cars, Caisse Commune, Cambio, CampusCars, CarSharing, Car-Share, CHOICE, CityCarClub, community cars, cOgO Car, Co-Op Auto Network, Cooperative Auto Network (CAN), Dancing Rabbit, Flexcar, GreenCar, HaBil, HOURCAR, ICVS, Mobizen, Motor Pool Co-operative, NTUC CarCo-op, Posibil (Norway), PubliCars, self-drive taxis, Stadtcar, Stadtmobil, Station Cars, StattAuto, teilAuto, Witkars and Zipcar.

Carpooling” or “ride-sharing” refers to the shared use of a car for a specific journey, in particular for commuting to work, often by people who each have a car but travel together to save costs. However, there is a slight terminological hitch in the UK where the term car sharing (two words in this usage) is used for what in the U.S. is called “ride sharing“. Carsharing in the sense discussed in this article is a recent development in Britain, and while such plans are still known more known as car clubs (a term which, in the U.S., refers strictly to a club of car hobbyists) the international term carsharing is gradually gaining currency there as well.

As is often the case with innovations that spring up more or less spontaneously in different parts of the world, operations are organized in many different ways in different places, according to the objectives of the organizers and users. A small informal start-up may have only one shared car, and only a handful of sharers. Larger services tend to focus on urban areas where there are many potential customers.

Carsharing differs from traditional car rentals in the following ways:

  • Carsharing is not limited by office hours
  • Reservation, pickup, and return is all self-service
  • Vehicles can be rented by the hour, as well as by the day
  • Users are members and have been pre-approved to drive (background driving checks have been performed and a payment mechanism has been established)
  • Vehicle locations are distributed throughout the service area, and often located for access by public transport.
  • Insurance and fuel costs are included in the rates.

Some carshare operations (CSOs) cooperate with local car rental firms to offer best value to their customers (in particular in situations where classic rental may be the cheaper option.)

Urban car sharing is often promoted as an alternative to owning a car where public transit, walking, and cycling can be used most of the time and a car is only necessary for out-of-town trips, moving large items, or special occasions. It can also be an alternative to owning multiple cars for households with more than one driver. A long-term study of City CarShare members by Robert Cervero, Professor of City and Regional Planning at the University of California, Berkeley, found that 30 percent of households that joined sold a car; others delayed purchasing one. Transit use, bicycling, and walking also increased among members.[citation needed]

Car sharing is generally not cost-effective for commuting to a full-time job on a regular basis. Most carsharing advocates, operators and cooperating public agencies believe that those who do not drive daily or who drive less than 10,000 kilometers (about 6,200 statute miles) annually may find carsharing to be more cost-effective than car ownership.[2] But variations of 50% on this figure are reported by operators and others depending on local context.[citation needed] If occasional use of a shared vehicle costs significantly less than car ownership, this makes automobile use more accessible to low-income households.

Car sharing can also help reduce congestion and pollution. Replacing private automobiles with shared ones directly reduces demand for parking spaces. The fact that only a certain number of cars can be in use at any one time may reduce traffic congestion at peak times. Even more important for congestion, the strong metering of costs provides a cost incentive to drive less. With owned automobiles many expenses are independent of how much they are driven (such as original purchase, insurance, and maintenance).[3]

Successful carsharing development has tended to be associated mainly with densely populated areas such as city centers and more recently university and other campuses. There are some programs (mostly in Europe) for providing services in lower density and rural areas.[citation needed] Low-density areas are considered more difficult to serve with car sharing because of the lack of alternative modes of transportation and the potentially larger distance that users must travel to reach the cars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carsharing

McKinleyville Madness

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on March 22, 2008 by highboldtage

 It’s in the water……….

Water fluoridation issue goes to citizens’ committee

By NATHAN RUSHTON, The Eureka Reporter

After hearing lengthy testimony from dozens of concerned customers who opposed the chemical additive, the board approved 4-1, which director Jeff Dunk voting against, to send the matter to a citizens’ committee to put the issue to the voters in an upcoming general election vote.

But a McKinleyville citizens’ committee on fluoride doesn’t exist and there wasn’t any clear direction from the board to form such a committee nor was there any indication from anyone in the audience that they had any plans to take such a move on.

In response to calls from the audience to clarify just what the vote meant, MCSD General Manager Tom Marking offered his own interpretation.

“It’s a polite way of saying we are not doing anything,” Marking told the crowd.

Noticeably absent from Wednesday’s discussion was the unnamed MCSD customer who district staff said initiated the controversial matter in December 2006 with a request for fluoridation to be discussed.

http://urlet.com/surprise.cb

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers